Persimmon boss to leave after ‘distraction’ over pay

Media playback is unsupported on your device

The boss of Persimmon Jeff Fairburn is to leave after a row over his £75m pay award.

Persimmon said he left by “mutual agreement and at the request of the company”.

It said the issue was having a “negative impact” on the firm’s reputation and on “Jeff’s ability to continue in his role”.

Last month Mr Fairburn walked away from a BBC interview when asked about his pay.

“I’d rather not talk about that,” he told a BBC reporter when asked in October about the pay award.

Will he keep his pay?

Mr Fairburn had seen his pay package reduced from £100m after a public outcry.

He will now keep £75m worth of shares when he leaves at the end of the month.

The company said it could not claw back any of the share awards, known as a long-term incentive award (LTIP).

It added that he would receive no further pay after he left on 31 December.

Why is he going?

Roger Devlin, Persimmon’s chairman, said: “Given the continuing distraction around the scale of his remuneration resulting from the 2012 LTIP, the Board believes that it is now necessary for there to be to be a change of leadership”.

However, he also pointed out that the company’s stock market value had doubled since Mr Fairburn took over in 2013, to £7.5bn.

Mr Devlin, who was appointed chairman in June, also said that under his tenure the company had also handed more than £2.2bn to shareholders.

Analysis: Reputational damage

By Dominic O’Connell Today programme business presenter

Your boss offers you a pay deal that will only see you do well if the company does well.

All the directors agree, and the shareholders are nearly unanimous in their support. The company does well – much better than expected – and your promised bonanza duly arrives.

Hooray! Or rather, oh no, if your name is Jeff Fairburn.

There was no issue with the way he ran the company, it was just reputational damage caused by the £75m pay award.

The public concern was stoked by the feeling that some of Persimmon’s success was thanks to public subsidy – the Help to Buy programme has helped fuel the housing market, with Persimmon one of the beneficiaries.

There is also a wider concern – which is beginning to surface among economic commentators – that the big housebuilders are simply doing too well, with their enormous returns to shareholders over recent years the result not of good management but of the exploitation of what has become an oligopoly.

What did Mr Fairburn say?

Mr Fairburn had previously said he would give a “substantial proportion” of the bonus to charity in an attempt to defuse the row. However, he never disclosed how much would be handed over.

As his departure was announced, Mr Fairburn, said: “I had hoped that revealing my plans to create a charitable trust and to waive a proportion of the award would enable the company to put the issue of the 2012 LTIP behind it”.

“However, this has not been the case and so it is clearly now in the best interests of Persimmon that I should step down. I wish the company the very best for the future.”

Why was the bonus so big?

The bonus was based on awards of shares, the value of which rose sharply when low interest rates and a government house buying scheme helped raise Persimmon’s performance.

When the LTIP was set up in 2012 the shares were trading at £4 but by the time bonuses were handed out last year the shares were trading at £24.

As there was no cap on the award of shares, it meant there was no limit to the payout.

Has anyone else left?

Chairman Roger Devlin replaced Nicholas Wrigley, whose resignation was announced in December.

Jonathan Davie, the non-executive director who was head of the remuneration committee, left at the same time.

The company said they had resigned because they realised the bonus scheme should have had a cap.

The company took further steps to attempt to defuse the row before April’s annual general meeting by announcing that Mr Fairburn’s bonus payout would be cut by £25m by reducing the number of shares he was entitled to.

At the AGM 48.5% of investors’ votes were cast against the remuneration report.

Who is taking over?

David Jenkinson, currently managing director, will be appointed as interim chief executive from 31 December.

He had also been caught up in the pay row, as along with Mr Fairburn, and chief financial officer Mike Killoran he stood to share in a £200m payout.

Mr Jenkinson’s share awards were cut by £2.5m to £40m ahead of the AGM.

The company said Mr Jenkinson’s pay would not change while he was interim chief executive.

A search for a permanent successor is underway, the company said.